An Intriguing Logic with Two Implicational Connectives
نویسنده
چکیده
Matthew Spinks [35] introduces implicative BCSK-algebras, expanding implicative BCK-algebras with an additional binary operation. Subdirectly irreducible implicative BCSK-algebras can be viewed as flat posets with two operations coinciding only in the 1and 2-element cases, each, in the latter case, giving the two-valued implication truth-function. We introduce the resulting logic (for the general case) in terms of matrix methodology in §1, showing how to reformulate the matrix semantics as a Kripke-style possible worlds semantics, thereby displaying the distinction between the two implications in the more familiar language of modal logic. In §§2 and 3 we study, from this perspective, the fragments obtained by taking the two implications separately, and – after a digression (in §4) on the intuitionistic analogue of the material in §3 – consider them together in §5, closing with a discussion in §6 of issues in the theory of logical rules. Some material is treated in three appendices to prevent §§1–6 from becoming overly distended.
منابع مشابه
Paraconsistency, Implication, and Truth
The present study is a sequel to [3] and [5]. We further explore preservational properties of a class of implicational connectives. The implicational approach to preservation examines what happens when the implicational connective is required to preserve various properties. We focus on a particular class of properties, called meta-valuational properties, and the class of implicational connectiv...
متن کاملA hierarchy of implicational (semilinear) logics: the propositional case
In Abstract Algebraic Logic the general study of propositional non-classical logics has been traditionally based on the abstraction of the Lindenbaum-Tarski process. In this kind of process one considers the Leibniz relation of indiscernible, i.e. logically equivalent, formulae. Such approach has resulted in a classification of logics partly based on generalizations of equivalence connectives: ...
متن کاملImplicational (semilinear) logics I: a new hierarchy
In Abstract Algebraic Logic, the general study of propositional non-classical logics has been traditionally based on the abstraction of the Lindenbaum-Tarski process. In this process one considers the Leibniz relation of indiscernible formulae. Such approach has resulted in a classification of logics partly based on generalizations of equivalence connectives: the Leibniz hierarchy. This paper p...
متن کاملTruth Values and Connectives in Some Non-Classical Logics
The question as to whether the propositional logic of Heyting, which was a formalization of Brouwer's intuitionistic logic, is finitely many valued or not, was open for a while (the question was asked by Hahn). Kurt Gödel (1932) introduced an infinite decreasing chain of intermediate logics, which are known nowadays as Gödel logics, for showing that the intuitionistic logic is not finitely (man...
متن کاملAn Abstract Approach to Fuzzy Logics: implicational semilinear logics
This paper presents a new abstract framework to deal in a uniform way with the increasing variety of fuzzy logics studied in the literature. By means of notions and techniques from Abstract Algebraic Logic, we perform a study of non-classical logics based on the kind of generalized implication connectives they possess. It yields the new hierarchy of implicational logics. In this framework the n...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic
دوره 41 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2000